Here is another example of Connie Thomas of Quality Time Visitation violating the rules of the Supervised Visitation Network. General Policy rule 6.2.3 states "A provider must not make recommendations or state opinions about future visitation arrangements."
In Thomas's letter, she acknowledges the temporary arrangments agreed by the sole custodial parent and the visiting parent but then goes on to change them. Just incredible.
Supervsied Visitation Network Executive Director Joe Nullet shared that a monitor is NOT a party to the visitation order. Connie Thomas has NO legal standing in the family court case; only the 2 parents have legal standing yet Thomas continues to make changes to visitation arrangements.
What is she? The monitor from hell?
Thomas Letter Jan12
No comments:
Post a Comment