What doesnt Connie Thomas get?

Here is another example of Connie Thomas of Quality Time Visitation violating the rules of the Supervised Visitation Network. General Policy rule 6.2.3 states "A provider must not make recommendations or state opinions about future visitation arrangements."

In Thomas's letter, she acknowledges the temporary arrangments agreed by the sole custodial parent and the visiting parent but then goes on to change them. Just incredible.

Supervsied Visitation Network Executive Director Joe Nullet shared that a monitor is NOT a party to the visitation order. Connie Thomas has NO legal standing in the family court case; only the 2 parents have legal standing yet Thomas continues to make changes to visitation arrangements.

What is she? The monitor from hell?


Thomas Letter Jan12

What Happend to Me at Quality Time Visitation in Claremont California

The following tells what happened to me at Quality Time Visitation of Claremont California. Specifics of a Family Court order is ignored, QT ignores its own rules and makes up rules as it sees fit. The legal rights of the sole legal and physical custodian of the children are trampled.

SVNetwork2